🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.